Table of Contents
If you’ve followed me for any amount of time, then you know I love my watercolors. I use them in my bullet journal constantly. This is a source of much curiosity for many of my readers and followers. Well, today I’m going to experiment with two popular journals used in the bullet journal community – the Leuchtturm1917 and the Moleskine. I put them head to head with a bullet journal watercolor test and recorded it all meticulously. So let’s see how these two beauties performed, shall we?
Before we jump into the nitty gritty of the experiment, here’s all the supplies I used in this very thorough watercolor test.
Paints and Inks
Brushes and Pens
Pigma Micron (for notes)
The Basic Bullet Journal Watercolor Test
I used watercolors in two pages in both the Leuchtturm1917 and the Moleskine. The first page of each was the basic test, with only a few color swatches. The second page was the stress test. Let’s check out the first page with the basic bullet journal watercolor test first!
The Hydrus Paints
After I got my Hydrus paints ready in my palette and I prepared my work space with a few paper towels, I was ready to go. I used the Aquash brush pens to create a gradient swatch for each of the colors on the pages of both journals. I used water pretty sparingly for these, which is how I typically use watercolors in my journal.
As you can see from the pictures above, both journals seemed to do fine. There’s a bit of paper warping directly where the water touched it, but nothing ridiculous. So far, so good. Now let’s move on to the more exotic sample of paints!
The Metallic Paints
Next, I tried some of my favorite paints – the Finetec gold palette! These beautiful colors are fantastic for lettering, calligraphy, and accents – but it has a slightly different set of ingredients due to the metallic components. So how did it do in the journals?
I painted little square swatches in both journals, including two extras – the Liquitex copper and the Bleedproof white. Both the Leuchtturm1917 and the Moleskine did fine with these, too! It does look as though the Moleskine samples are a little bit more smooth, while the Leuchtturm’s samples puddled a bit. So perhaps the Moleskine can handle the thicker paint with a bit more ease?
Did It Bleed?
Here’s the big question. Did these watercolors bleed through the page or ruin the page before it? The answer is…
Nope! Neither the Leuchtturm1917 or the Moleskine show any signs of bleeding. Each journal has some ghosting, but only as much as any dark pen would. Both journals’ pages are a bit wrinkly, or “crispy” as I like to say. But the watercolor didn’t damage the back of the test page, nor the next page it touched.
Okay, all of that was nice, but it was the little leagues. Let’s see how they handle the big boy bullet journal watercolor test!
Enter the Fox Den Resource Library
Subscribe to get access to 40+ pages of printables, brush lettering worksheets, and more!
The Stress Tests
The first page was easy. That level of watercolor is pretty on par with what I use on a regular basis – no crazy blending, no layers, no excessive water. But I wanted to push these journals to their limits and see what happened. For science, of course.
Just a note – I’ll show details of each technique as I do them, but hold tight until the end for the final pictures and analysis. Otherwise this post would be absolutely stuffed with images and it would load slower!
Test #1: A Simple Blend
With this technique, I used my Aquash brush pen to pick up some green paint. Then I started on the left, gradually working my way right while getting a more diluted color as I went. Next, I picked up blue and did the same, but from left to right. This technique mixes two colors in for an ombre effect. It’s a simple, basic bullet journal watercolor method, but it requires that each paint stay wet while you mix them.
Test #2: The Wet on Wet Blend
This effect is fairly simple in nature, too, but requires a very wet page, which is a bit scary on non-watercolor paper! First, I created layer of clean water. Then, I loaded up on blue, which I touched to the wet paper in several spots. The blue blossomed out into the clean water. Then I did the same with red paint. The two colors blended into each other softly, creating a very cool watercolor effect.
Usually, I dab away the standing water with a paper towel after the colors have been put down on the paper, but that takes away a lot of the pigment. I have never left that much standing water dry naturally in my journal – but this time, I did. Eeek! It took probably 20-30 minutes for them to dry completely.
Test #3: The Black and White Test
This test required a flat wash of India ink. Why would one need to do that in their journal? I don’t know, this is an experiment! Science! Data! Just go with it, okay?
In each journal, I put down a swatch of Dr. Ph. Martin’s Black Star Ink and let it dry, which took no time at all. Then I grabbed my Dr. Ph. Martin’s Bleedproof White (which is watered down a bit to make it thinner) and lettered on top of the ink using my Aquash brush pen.
I noticed an interesting little detail in both journals that I thought I’d mention here. The dots on the page sometimes peeked through the ink or paint, like in the image below. Neat, right?
Test #4: Just Absurd Amounts of Water
This bullet journal watercolor test isn’t really a technique so much as a stress test. I wanted to see what would happen if I just painted with a riduclous amount of water, then wrote over it. I laid down an extremely wet wash of orange and let it dry completely. Then I lettered over it with the rather wet Pentel Pocket Brush Pen. I was curious if the abuse of water would make the wet, black ink bleed through the page or ghost in any way.
Again, the results are at the end of this post! Just keep scrolling to see the final images 🙂
Test #5: The Wet Nib Calligraphy Test
In this final test, I used my nib calligraphy pen with watercolor as the ink. I was curious if having super concentrated watercolor in a very small space, mixed with the pressure of a dip pen, would push it to bleeding through the page. I used the Aquash to load the watercolor onto the nib by brushing it on the nib’s belly. Then I simply wrote on the page of both journals and let it dry.
So how did the journals do when they were all dry? Take a look!
Test #1 (with the blue and green blend): The blend went perfectly fine! It was able to handle that level of water no problem. I made a note that the next page seemed to have a bit of moisture, but after a few minutes, it dried and ceased to be a problem. Like I said earlier, there was a slight gritty texture, but it’s just a quirk of the different paper.
Test #2 (the wet on wet blend): This test actually wasn’t as bad as I thought. It took forever to dry, but it looks super cool. My only complaint here is that the paint didn’t really want to spread out in the wash of clean water. I had to push it around a little bit to get it to expand into the full swatch. But in the end, it blended fine.
Test #3 (the black and white test): It all turned out great in the Moleskine! The ink wash was a total non-issue, and the layer of Bleedproof white didn’t cause any problems at all. It all went smoothly!
Test #4 (the stress test): This test also didn’t seem to be a big hangup. The watercolor dried fine, and the lettering with the Pocket Brush Pen didn’t seem to be a big deal for the journal.
Test #5 (the watercolor calligraphy): Again, the Moleskine performed admirably. The calligraphy turned out just great.
The Next Page
So how did this crazy bullet journal watercolor test affect the next page? Take a look.
Okay, so pretty funky. The back of the test page was wrinkly, distorted, and crispy as hell. Plus the ghosting was a bit crazy. But the following page was still fine! There were a few spots where there was some moisture, but it was incredibly minor. All in all, it did great. Despite my abuse of water and allowing swatches to dry naturally, there was no bleeding to speak of. And that’s pretty awesome.
Test #1 (with the blue and green blend): This test was pretty much the same as the Moleskine. It did great!
Test #2 (the wet on wet blend): The watercolor seemed to pool in spots worse than the Moleskine, but if I’m being honest, I like the finished result much better in the Leuchtturm1917. It turned out super cool! The paint was much more willing to disperse without me pushing it around, so maybe that’s why it dried so neat.
Test #3 (the black and white test): Now that this test is done, I can’t believe I was actually worried about this one. It handled everything like a champ. And the ink dried a little glossy, which is kinda neat.
Test #4 (the stress test): I’m happy to say that nothing of note happened here, either. The paint dried, I brush lettered over it, and everything was good.
Test #5 (the watercolor calligraphy): The lettering took a while to dry because of how wet it was when I wrote everything out, but other than that, it went perfectly.
The Next Page
Did the bullet journal watercolor test push through to the next page of the Leuchtturm1917?
And here, ladies and gentleman, is one of the reasons I love the Leuchtturm1917 so much. The next page is gorgeous. Yes, there is some distortion on the back of the test page, but it’s incredibly minor. There is some ghosting, but again, it’s insignificant. I’d get these results with a dark brush pen. Despite not being a watercolor journal, the Leuchtturm1917 can take quite the watercolor beating.
Because neither the Moleskine or the Leuchtturm1917 are watercolor journals, they are going to warp to some extent. As you can see in the photo below, The Moleskine didn’t handle it as well the the Leuchtturm1917. With the exact same test between them, the warping is more significant – and it even slightly affected the page behind it! The top corner is pulling up a little bit, too.
In comparison, the Leuchtturm1917 warps very little. It is a bit wavy, but is quite minor. I’m quite satisfied with the level of sass the pages gave me after the stress I put them through. The Leuchtturm1917 definitely took it better than the Moleskine.
However, it should be noted that the warping lessens after you close the book for a while. For example, here’s the Moleskine, Leuchtturm1917, and my active bullet journal (also a Leuchtturm1917). In my bullet journal, I’m about halfway through the book. I use watercolors frequently, and I have since the beginning. See how bad the warping is? It’s really insignificant. That’s because after the journal is closed for a bit, the page straightens itself out once again until only a little bit of warping remains.
It also should be noted that I’m using a softcover Moleskine and a hardcover Leuchtturm1917. That does make a difference when it comes to smoothing out pages over time. Just something to keep in mind!
Both the Leuchtturm1917 and the Moleskine performed better than one might expect with the bullet journal watercolor test. But in the end, my loyalty sticks with my trusty Leuchtturm1917. I love using watercolors in my bullet journal, and knowing that the Leuchtturm can take this level of watercolor graciously is too good to be true.
For anyone who is nervous about trying watercolors in your journal, I want to say this to you: it will be okay! Your journal can take more than you think. If you are concerned, try out some watercolor swatches on the last page of your journal. Have paper towels on hand. I promise, the worst that happens is that you don’t like having crispy pages and you decide to not do it again. If these two journals can take the bombardment of water that I just threw at them and not fall apart, then your journal can handle a bit of watercolors. Just go slow, be a bit careful, and slowly push the limits of your comfort level. You will discover that this technique is fun, simple, and not a death sentence for your journal – I promise!